Date Published
May 2, 2018
Summary
This technical memo addresses three specific questions raised by reviewers of the subsidence analysis in a March 2018 meeting. These questions are outlined and answered below.
- What was the minimum zone size used to represent faults implicitly within the FLAC3D model?
- What is the volume of caved rock remaining in the ground at the end of mine life?
- What is the potential for residual subsidence after production from the panel cave has ceased?
Cited In
Reference Information
Pierce, M., and T. Garza-Cruz. 2018. Answers to Questions Raised in March 16, 2018 Review of Itasca Analysis of Resolution Subsidence. Ref: 2-4208-04: 18TM15. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Pierce Engineering and Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. May 2.
*This PDF document is not Section 508 accessibility compliant. If you require accessibility assistance, please contact us to Request Assistance.