Documents Cited - General Plan of Operations

Hanks, T.C. and Bakun, W.H., 2002, A bilinear source-caling model for M-log A observations of continental earthquakes: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 92, p. 1841- 1846.

View DetailsDownload PDF

Hanks, T.C. and Kanamori, H. 1979, A moment magnitude scale: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 84, p. 2348-2350.

View DetailsDownload PDF

Hatch (2015) Resolution Project Geochemistry: Prediction of Block Cave Water Chemistry. Draft report prepared by Hatch for Resolution Copper Mining, January 8, 2016.

View DetailsDownload PDF

Hehnke, C., Ballantyne, G., Martin, H., Hart, W., Schwartz, A., and Stein, H. 2012. Geology and Exploration Progress at the Resolution Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit: Society of Economic Geologists, Inc. Special Publication 16, pp. 147-156.

View DetailsDownload PDF

Heidrick, T.L., and Titley, S.R. 1982. Fracture and dike patterns in Laramide plutons and their structural and tectonic implications, in Titley, S.R., ed., Advances in geology of the porphyry copper deposits, southwestern United States: Tucson, University of Arizona Press, p. 73-92.

View DetailsDownload PDF

Hem, J.D. 1985. Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper No. 2254, 3rd Edition.

View DetailsDownload PDF

Huckleberry, G., 1993, Surficial Geology of the Supersition Mountain Piedmont Area, Northern Pinal and Eastern Maricopa Counties, Arizona: OFR-93-15, scale 1:24,000, 6 sheets, 33 p.

View DetailsDownload PDF

EIS Status Update - March 2019

Screenshot of EIS Status Update document cover

Information on the forthcoming Draft EIS is now available under the ‘EIS Info’ tab. To view the update, click here.

EIS Timeline - Feb 2019

  1. Proponent submits revised Plan of Operations [Sep 2014]
  2. Federal Register Notice of Intent to prepare EIS [Mar 2016]
  3. Public scoping period and scoping meetings
    [5 meetings between Mar-Jun 2016; comment period extended from 60 days to 120 days, closed Jul 18, 2016 ]
  4. Compile and review existing data
  5. Prepare project description and identify project alternatives
  6. Publish Alternatives Evaluation Report [Sep 2017]
  7. We Are Here
    Validate Baseline Information; analyze environmental effects
  8. Prepare Draft EIS
  9. Federal Register Notice of Availability of Draft EIS
  10. 90-day public review and comment period, with public meetings
  11. Respond to public comments and prepare Final EIS
  12. Federal Register Notice of Availability of Final EIS and Draft ROD
  13. 45-day Public Objection Period
  14. Resolve objections to Final EIS and draft ROD
  15. Issue Final Record of Decision

[ View Larger Version ]

Forest Points of Contact

Media & General Info
John Scaggs

Project Manager
Resolution Copper
Mary Rasmussen

Apache Leap Special Management Area
Apache Leap SMA website